Key Takeaways
1. Grief is a complex, universal human response to loss.
Grief is commonly defined as a universal reaction to bereavement (i.e. observed in all cultures and throughout human history), involving bodily/physical, emotional, cognitive, and spiritual experiences and expressed in a wide range of observable behaviours.
Defining grief. Grief is the multifaceted response to bereavement, the loss of a loved one through death. It's not just an emotional state but encompasses physical, cognitive, and spiritual dimensions, manifesting in diverse observable behaviors. This universal human experience is deeply intertwined with love, as "we grieve for those we loved who have died."
Primary vs. secondary loss. The initial death is the primary loss, involving both the physical absence and the breaking of an emotional tie. However, this triggers numerous secondary losses, which are the consequences or "fall-out" of the death. These can range from practical changes like financial security or daily tasks to profound symbolic losses such as one's identity (e.g., becoming a widow/widower, or an "orphan" after losing both parents) or shattered hopes and dreams for the future.
Multidimensional experience. The experience of grief is holistic, affecting every aspect of a person's being. Physical symptoms can include:
- Headaches, aching muscles, nausea, exhaustion
- Menstrual irregularities, loss of appetite, insomnia
Emotional responses span: - Sadness, anger, guilt, jealousy, fear, anxiety, shame, relief, pining
Cognitively, individuals may experience: - Obsessive thoughts, inability to concentrate, disorientation, a sense of the deceased's presence
Spiritually, it can lead to a search for meaning or a questioning of faith, demonstrating its pervasive impact.
2. There's no single "right" way or fixed timeline for grieving.
But I think that before you begin reading, you should accept the guiding principle that there’s no single ‘correct’ way to grieve, which includes not being able to put a time limit on the grieving process: sometimes, grief may continue for a lifetime, because we continue to love the person we have lost.
Individuality of grief. Despite common patterns, every person's grief is unique, defying rigid theoretical boxes or prescribed timelines. The belief in a fixed series of "stages" of grief, popularized by models like Kübler-Ross's five stages (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance) or Bowlby's four phases (numbing, yearning, disorganization, reorganization), is often a misconception. These models, while providing a framework, do not dictate a linear or universal progression.
Critiques of stage models. Research, such as Parkes's London Study, reveals that grief is far more a "mixture of reactions which wax and wane in relation to external events and may be delayed, prolonged, or exaggerated." C.S. Lewis famously described grief as a "long valley, a winding valley," where one repeatedly encounters "the same sort of country you thought you had left behind miles ago." This highlights the oscillating, non-linear nature of the grieving process.
Beyond recovery. The expectation to "recover" or "get over" grief within a certain timeframe is often unrealistic and unhelpful. Instead, bereaved individuals adapt, adjust, and are permanently changed by their losses. The notion of "grief work" – the idea that one must actively confront and process grief to detach from the deceased – has also been challenged. Many people find healthy ways to maintain a "continuing bond" with their loved one, recognizing that "there’s no resolution or completion per se, but rather they adapt, adjust, and are to some degree changed forever."
3. Grief serves an evolutionary purpose: adapting to severed attachments.
Viewed in this light, many of the apparently puzzling reactions to separation and loss (such as continuing to yearn and search even when a lost caregiver is objectively – and permanently – unavailable [i.e. dead]) seem more reasonable and, in many situations, adaptive.
Attachment theory's foundation. John Bowlby's attachment theory provides a foundational explanation for why we grieve. Drawing from ethology, he proposed that humans have an innate tendency to form emotional ties (attachments) for security and survival, much like imprinting in animals. Love, from an evolutionary perspective, is a mechanism to ensure pair-bonding for offspring survival, making loss a profound source of pain.
Grief as separation anxiety. Adult grief is seen as an extension of a child's distress response to separation, comprising protest, despair, and detachment (later "reorganization"). These reactions, like yearning and searching for the deceased, are adaptive in an evolutionary context, designed to keep infants close to protective caregivers. When an adult loses a loved one, these same impulses manifest, even when the loss is permanent, highlighting the deep-seated nature of attachment bonds.
Grief work and adaptation. Freud's concept of "grief work" posited that mourning involves withdrawing psychic energy from the lost object to free the ego for new attachments. While influential, modern interpretations, like Worden's "tasks of mourning," emphasize:
- Acknowledge and accept the reality of the death.
- Experience/process the pain of grief.
- Adjust to a world without the deceased.
- Find an enduring connection with the deceased in the midst of embarking on a new life.
This reframes grief not as total detachment, but as a reorganization of the relationship and self, allowing for a "continuing bond."
4. Society and culture profoundly shape how we experience and express grief.
Grief, at least in its public manifestations, is socially variable and . . . the social location of a deceased person has much to do with the manner in which grief is expressed.
Cultural variability. Grief is not solely an individual, internal experience; it is deeply embedded in social and cultural contexts. Cultures dictate "appropriate" ways of grieving, influencing its expression, duration, and even the very definition of death. For instance, some cultures encourage open, communal displays of anguish, while others value stoicism or restrict overt grieving to specific dates, as seen in some Muslim or Chinese communities.
Mourning rituals. All known cultures have rituals to mark death, such as funerals, memorial services, or specific mourning periods (e.g., wearing black, covering mirrors in Jewish homes). These rituals serve therapeutic functions, helping survivors accept the loss, affirm beliefs, express emotions, and receive social support. They provide a structured context for collective meaning-making and help integrate the loss into the community's fabric.
Disenfranchised grief. A powerful illustration of social influence is "disenfranchised grief," which is grief not openly acknowledged, socially sanctioned, or publicly shared. This can occur due to:
- Relationships: Non-traditional (e.g., homosexual, extra-marital) or not considered "close enough" (e.g., friends, ex-spouses).
- Losses: Not recognized as significant (e.g., miscarriage, pet loss, psychological death from dementia).
- Grievers: Perceived as incapable of grieving (e.g., young children, elderly, people with learning disabilities).
- Circumstances: Stigmatized deaths (e.g., suicide, AIDS, drug abuse).
- Expression: Grieving styles that clash with societal norms (e.g., instrumental grievers showing little overt emotion).
This highlights how societal norms "police" grief, labeling non-conforming responses as "abnormal."
5. The nature of the relationship profoundly impacts the grief experience.
While both the experience and expression of grief are shaped by social and cultural influences, bereaved individuals within the same socio-cultural group still vary enormously in how they respond to the loss of a loved one. In turn, who that loved one is (or was) will help determine the nature and intensity of their grief response.
Kinship and intensity. The specific kinship tie to the deceased significantly influences the nature and intensity of grief. While spousal bereavement is often considered the "default" for research, the loss of a child is widely regarded as the "most agonizing and distressing source of grief" in Western cultures, regardless of the child's age. This is because it represents a profound "loss of part of the self" and a shattering of future hopes.
Spousal bereavement. For older adults, spousal loss is a normative, expected event, though still deeply impactful, affecting psychological, social, physical, and economic well-being. Younger widowhood, however, is non-normative and often more disruptive, especially if sudden, leading to greater health decline and secondary losses like becoming a single parent. The quality of the marital relationship (e.g., mutual dependence) and circumstances of death (anticipated vs. sudden) also play crucial roles in adjustment.
Parental and sibling loss. Losing a parent in adulthood, while normative, can still be profoundly impactful, especially if the death is sudden or if the adult child has not achieved full autonomy. It often brings home one's own mortality. Sibling loss, particularly in childhood, can be traumatic and lifelong, often disenfranchised by society. Children's grief responses to a sibling's death include:
- "I hurt inside" (physical/emotional pain)
- "I don't understand" (cognitive confusion)
- "I don't belong" (feeling alienated from family)
- "I'm not enough" (guilt, feeling unable to help parents)
These reflect their unique developmental challenges in processing loss.
6. Complicated grief is a distinct, prolonged disruption of normal adaptation.
In general terms, complicated grief (CG) can be understood as something like a ‘derailing’ of the normal, usually painful process of adapting to the loss of a significant person.
Defining complicated grief. Complicated grief (CG), also known as problematic, abnormal, or pathological grief, represents a significant deviation from the typical grieving process. It's not merely intense or prolonged normal grief, but a "derailing" that severely impairs functioning. While there's debate on whether it's a quantitative (degree) or qualitative (kind) difference from uncomplicated grief, recent consensus, particularly with the diagnosis of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD), recognizes it as a distinct mental disorder.
Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD). PGD is characterized by marked and persistent separation distress (intense loneliness, yearning, preoccupation with the deceased) and significant impairment in social, occupational, or family functioning, lasting at least six consecutive months. Additional symptoms include:
- Diminished sense of self
- Difficulty accepting the loss as real
- Avoidance of reminders of the loss
- Inability to trust others or feel understood
- Extreme bitterness or anger over the death
- Extreme difficulty moving on with life
- Pervasive numbness or detachment
- Belief that life is empty or meaningless
- Feeling stunned, dazed, or shocked by the death
PGD is distinct from major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Risk factors and modes of death. Various factors increase the risk of CG:
- Kinship: Loss of a spouse or child, especially to violent or sudden death.
- Vulnerability: Insecure attachment styles, high pre-death marital dependency, pre-existing psychological problems.
- Social: Lack of social support, low family cohesion, disenfranchised grief.
- Mode of death: Sudden, unexpected, untimely, or violent deaths (murder, suicide, accidents) are particularly traumatic. Suicide bereavement, for instance, often involves heightened abandonment, shame, blame, guilt, and a relentless search for "why," making it a special case of traumatic loss.
7. Grief can be a catalyst for profound personal growth.
However, research conducted within Positive Psychology has shown that trauma of various kinds – including sudden and traumatic bereavement – can serve as a catalyst for positive changes. This is referred to as post-traumatic growth (PTG).
Beyond suffering. While grief is inherently painful, it is not exclusively a negative experience. The concept of Post-Traumatic Growth (PTG) highlights that trauma, including bereavement, can act as a catalyst for significant positive changes. This perspective challenges the traditional view of grief solely as a debilitating process, suggesting that personal gain can be found in suffering.
Meaning-making and PTG. In the aftermath of loss, individuals often embark on a profound "search for meaning" – whether practical (how did they die?), relational (who am I now?), or existential (why did this happen?). While a prolonged, painful search for meaning can predict more intense grief, the capacity to find significance in the loss is strongly associated with greater long-term well-being and resilience. This meaning-making process is especially critical in traumatic losses like suicide or homicide.
Dimensions of growth. PTG manifests in several ways:
- Enhanced relationships: Valuing friends and family more, increased compassion, longing for deeper intimacy.
- Changed self-perception: Developing wisdom, personal strength, gratitude, and greater acceptance of vulnerabilities.
- Shift in life philosophy: A fresh appreciation for life, re-evaluation of priorities (less materialistic), and better ability to live in the present.
PTG involves rebuilding a shattered "assumptive world," not by restoring the old one, but by accepting the breakage and constructing a new, more resilient, and open way of living.
8. Language and metaphor are crucial tools for expressing and understanding grief.
The metaphors that grieving people spontaneously use often capture their actual experience better than the formal theories of grief.
Giving sorrow words. A core principle in bereavement support is the need to "give sorrow words," as Shakespeare advised. However, finding precise language to articulate the complex, often overwhelming feelings of grief can be incredibly difficult. Metaphors serve as a powerful means to express these abstract, invisible, or intangible experiences in concrete, understandable terms, often translating the non-literal into the literal.
Metaphors in action. Grieving individuals spontaneously use metaphors that reveal the depth and nature of their experience. Examples include:
- Physical sensations: "Grief felt so much like fear," "cut in half," "heartbroken."
- Euphemisms: "Lost my husband," "passed away."
- Journeys: "Long valley, a winding valley," "rollercoaster," "lost in a foreign city."
- Objects/entities: Cancer as a "monster," grief as an uninvited "houseguest."
These linguistic tools offer unique insights into personal grief that formal theories might miss.
Tonkin's circles. A particularly insightful visual metaphor is "Tonkin's circles." Initially, grief consumes one's entire life (a shaded circle filling a larger life circle). Over time, instead of the grief shrinking, the "life circle" grows around the enduring "grief circle." This illustrates that grief doesn't disappear but becomes integrated into a larger life, relieving the pressure to "get over it" while acknowledging that the deceased remains a part of one's identity. This metaphor aligns with the "Continuing Bonds" approach, where the relationship with the deceased transforms rather than severs.
9. The family unit grieves, not just the individual.
While grief is often viewed as a personal experience, it occurs in two realms simultaneously – the intrapsychic level and the interpersonal level.
Systemic impact. Death is fundamentally a family event, occurring within existing relationships and dynamics. Family systems theory posits that families are whole entities, greater than the sum of their individual members. Therefore, individual grief cannot be understood in isolation but must be contextualized within the family system, which includes individual members, their relationships, their ties to the deceased, and external interactions.
Disrupted equilibrium. The death of a family member disrupts the family's equilibrium, affecting its functioning and emotional/physical resources. For example, a spouse's death alters kinship networks, a child's death shatters future perceptions, and a breadwinner's death threatens security. The timing of the bereavement in the family lifecycle is critical; untimely deaths (e.g., children, young adults) are particularly challenging, especially when compounded by other stressors.
Healthy family processes. Effective family coping involves sharing the loss, maintaining open communication, reorganizing roles, and utilizing support systems. Funerals and memorial services provide crucial opportunities for collective acknowledgment and emotional expression. However, "dissynchrony of grief" can occur, where family members grieve differently, potentially leading to conflict or neglect of surviving children. Despite the pain, common loss can also foster renewed closeness, unity, and a deeper appreciation of each other's strengths, leading to positive outcomes like increased sensitivity or a re-prioritization of family values.
10. Modern society has professionalized and often hidden death.
This professionalisation of death – and the facts regarding where most people die – can be seen as one way in which death is hidden.
Medicalization and normalization. Historically, grief was seen as a spiritual condition. However, starting with Freud, grief became increasingly medicalized, distinguishing "normal" from "pathological" responses, and later normalized through stage models. This shift led to a focus on "symptomatology" and clinical management, sometimes reducing grief to a bodily disease.
Death as taboo. Anthropologists like Geoffrey Gorer and Philippe Aries argued that modern Western society denies death, leading to a lack of ritual and an inability for individuals to process personal grief. This "pornography of death" in media contrasts with individual concealment. While criticized for romanticizing past rituals, this thesis highlights how modern society struggles to "tame" death, leaving individuals feeling isolated in their grief.
Professionalization and sanitization. A significant transformation is the professionalization of death. Tasks once performed by families (e.g., preparing the body, making coffins) are now handled by specialists like "funeral directors" and medical institutions. Most deaths now occur in hospitals or care homes, with bodies often removed to memorial houses, stripping families of traditional functions. This "sanitization of death" removes the "messy reality" from public view, making death a distant, mediated event and further contributing to its hidden nature in modern Western societies.
Last updated:
