Key Takeaways
1. America's Founding Paradox: Equality Built on Inequality
That central paradox—that freedom depended on racial, gender, and class inequality—shaped American history as the cultural, religious, and social patterns of the new nation grew around it.
A radical idea. America was founded on the revolutionary principle that "all men are created equal," a concept that challenged centuries of aristocratic rule. However, this ringing declaration was immediately undermined by the reality that its authors, like Thomas Jefferson, owned slaves and considered women and indigenous peoples inferior. This wasn't a mere oversight; it was a deliberate feature of the new republic.
Defining "all men." For the Founders, the phrase "all men" did not encompass everyone. It explicitly excluded:
- Women
- Slaves
- Indians
- Paupers
These groups were deemed incapable or unworthy of self-determination and were walled off from political power. This exclusion allowed the white, propertied men within the body politic to consider themselves equal, creating a system where equality for some depended on inequality for others.
The Virginia model. The paradox was deeply rooted in colonial Virginia, where wealthy planters, facing threats from a growing underclass of poor white and enslaved laborers, deliberately split these groups along racial lines. The Virginia Slave Codes of 1705 granted white servants new rights while stripping black individuals of all rights, making racial slavery hereditary. This created a powerful alliance between rich and poor white men, who shared a sense of mastery over their black neighbors, thus solidifying a hierarchical society under the guise of white male equality.
2. The Antebellum South's Oligarchic Vision
The southern system, Hammond announced, was “the best in the world … such as no other people ever enjoyed upon the face of the earth,” and spreading it would benefit everyone.
"Cotton is King." By the 1840s, the South's economy revolved around cotton, an extractive industry that concentrated immense wealth and power in the hands of a few slaveholding planters. These oligarchs, though a tiny minority, dominated politics, culture, and society, shaping laws and narratives to protect their interests. They presented their system as the epitome of American democracy, where local voters (white men) determined their "domestic institutions," including slavery.
The mudsill theory. South Carolina Senator James Henry Hammond articulated this vision, arguing that every society needed a "mudsill" class to perform menial duties, supporting an elite class that drove "progress, civilization, and refinement." In the South, enslaved black people served as this mudsill, ensuring social harmony. Hammond warned that in the North, white men were forced into this mudsill role and, worse, were allowed to vote, threatening to redistribute wealth and cause "anarchy and poverty."
Suppressing dissent. To maintain their power, southern oligarchs stifled any opposition. They censored anti-slavery literature, implemented "gag rules" in Congress, and used violence (like the Ku Klux Klan) to intimidate poor whites who questioned the slave system. This created an increasingly isolated society where a minority of wealthy men believed they alone knew how to run the country, justifying their control by dehumanizing black people and appealing to white supremacy.
3. The Civil War's Unfinished Revolution for Equality
The Gettysburg Address reminded Americans they were engaged in a great test of “whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure.”
A new birth of freedom. The Civil War, sparked by southern slaveholders' attempt to destroy the Union, forced Americans to confront the paradox of their founding. Abraham Lincoln, rejecting the "mudsill theory," championed a "free labor" vision where hardworking individuals could rise. The Union's victory seemed to usher in a "new birth of freedom," expanding the definition of equality to include all men, regardless of race.
Transforming government. Republicans in Congress, freed from southern obstruction, rapidly transformed the federal government:
- Financial reforms: National currency, banking system, and income tax to fund the war and shift power from bankers to ordinary citizens.
- Economic development: Homestead Act, Department of Agriculture, and Land Grant College Act to promote farming and education in the West.
- Infrastructure: Union Pacific Railroad Company to connect the nation and develop western resources.
These policies aimed to create an economy where upward mobility was accessible to all.
Expanding citizenship. The Emancipation Proclamation (1863) freed slaves and allowed black men to fight for the Union, a crucial step towards citizenship. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments abolished slavery, granted citizenship and equal protection, and secured black male suffrage. This was a "breathtaking expansion of the democratic idea," but it notably excluded women, who were told their rights must wait.
4. The West: A New Home for Hierarchy and Exclusion
In the West, Confederate ideology took on a new life, and from there, over the course of the next 150 years, it came to dominate America.
A different founding. While the East grappled with expanding equality, the American West developed its own history, rooted in Spanish and Mexican colonial systems that favored large landholders and maintained caste systems, including Indian slavery. American settlers, arriving in large numbers after the Mexican-American War, brought their own racial biases and reinforced these hierarchies, ensuring that opportunity was primarily limited to white men.
Racialized laws. The California legislature, upon statehood in 1850, set a precedent for the West by codifying racial distinctions. Laws:
- Limited citizenship to "free white persons."
- Prohibited African Americans and Indians from testifying against whites.
- Permitted Indian children to be enslaved and vagrant Indians to be sold for labor.
- Targeted Chinese and Mexican miners with special taxes and violence.
These measures ensured white dominance and established a legal framework of inequality that would persist for decades.
Indian Wars and dehumanization. The Civil War years exacerbated racial tensions in the West, leading to brutal Indian Wars. Events like the Dakota Uprising (1862) and the Sand Creek Massacre (1864) convinced many Americans that indigenous peoples were "savages" who posed an existential threat. This dehumanization justified military campaigns and forced removals, like the Navajo's "Long Walk" to Bosque Redondo, solidifying a perception of Indians as enemies of the Republic, not equal citizens.
5. The Cowboy Myth: Individualism Rooted in Subordination
Democrats contrasted what they saw as a system of race-based wealth redistribution taking hold in the East with an image of the American West where hardworking men asked nothing of the government but to be left alone.
Reconstruction's counter-narrative. As Republicans in the East pushed for black equality during Reconstruction, southern Democrats, aided by President Andrew Johnson, fought back. They argued that government-enforced black rights were a "redistribution of wealth" from hardworking white taxpayers to lazy black men. To counter this "tyranny," they promoted the image of the western cowboy: a self-reliant, tough individualist who asked nothing of the government.
The reality of cowboy life. The romanticized cowboy myth ignored the harsh realities of the cattle industry. Cowboys, often men of color (one-third were black or Mexican), worked long hours for low wages in dangerous conditions, with little chance of upward mobility. Their lives mirrored those of industrial workers in eastern factories, but the myth portrayed them as independent heroes, protecting white interests from "barbaric Indians and cunning Mexicans."
Political weaponization. The cowboy image became a powerful political tool. In Missouri, former Confederates like Jesse James were recast as victims of a corrupt Republican government, persecuted for their Democratic leanings. This narrative, amplified by Liberal Republicans like Carl Schurz, fueled fears that "ignorant labor" (read: black voters) was dangerous to society, echoing the mudsill theory and laying the groundwork for a national backlash against federal efforts to promote equality.
6. The Southern-Western Alliance: Reshaping National Politics
By 1890, the West had an ideology more in common with that of the South than that of the North.
Republican miscalculation. After the Civil War, Republicans sought to expand their national power by admitting new western states, expecting them to align with northern interests. However, the West's extractive economies (mining, cattle, railroads) concentrated wealth in a few hands, much like the antebellum South's cotton industry. This economic structure fostered a hierarchical society, making western leaders more sympathetic to the ideology of former southern elites than to the common man.
A new political bloc. Western politicians, often representing powerful industrial interests, frequently allied with southern Democrats. This alliance proved decisive in 1890 when western Republicans joined Democrats to kill the Federal Elections Bill, which aimed to protect black voting rights in the South. This act effectively ended federal protection for black suffrage for 75 years, demonstrating the combined power of the South and West to maintain racial hierarchies.
Shared interests. The Trans-Mississippi Congress, formed in 1891, solidified this regional alliance, advocating for policies like easier access to money (silver coinage) and massive water development projects that benefited both regions. This cooperation, often at the expense of eastern economic policies and civil rights, cemented a political bloc that would profoundly influence American history, pushing back against federal intervention and reinforcing a vision of society where non-whites were excluded from power.
7. Progressivism's Blind Spot: Democracy for White Men Only
Roosevelt’s definition of hardworking Americans in the western mold excluded people of color, many immigrants (including Asians), organized workers, and independent women, all of whom had come to be seen as “special interests” wanting government benefits.
Roosevelt's "Square Deal." Theodore Roosevelt, a "damned cowboy" turned president, brought his western brand of democracy to the White House. He used federal power to regulate corporations, break up trusts, and promote public welfare, aiming for a "square deal" for ordinary white men. However, his progressive vision, while curbing corporate power, was inherently exclusive, defining "true Americans" as upwardly mobile white men.
Reinforcing hierarchies. Progressive reforms, while beneficial for many white Americans, often maintained or even reinforced existing racial and gender hierarchies. For example:
- Women's suffrage: Gained momentum by emphasizing women's role as wives and mothers who would "clean up politics," rather than as independent actors with equal rights.
- Racial categories: Western states continued to enact elaborate anti-miscegenation laws, expanding the list of "races" prohibited from marrying whites.
- Immigration: Laws like the Chinese Exclusion Act became national policy, and figures like Francis G. Newlands openly advocated for restricting immigration to "other than those of the white race."
The Dunning School. This era saw the academic legitimization of the "Lost Cause" narrative, particularly through the "Dunning School" of history. Scholars like William Archibald Dunning and Claude G. Bowers rewrote Reconstruction as a period of "negro domination" and corruption, arguing that black voting had destroyed southern society. This historical revisionism justified white supremacy and the suppression of black rights, further embedding the paradox of freedom for some, built on the subjugation of others.
8. Post-War Consensus and the Conservative Backlash
“Liberalism,” the influential literary critic Lionel Trilling wrote, “is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition … there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in circulation.”
The liberal consensus. World War II fostered a powerful sense of national unity and a renewed commitment to democratic ideals. The war effort, involving diverse Americans, led to demands for greater equality. Post-war, the "liberal consensus" emerged, with broad agreement that government should regulate business, provide social welfare, and promote infrastructure (e.g., GI Bill, Social Security, interstate highways). This era saw unprecedented economic growth and a rising middle class.
Challenging the paradox. The liberal consensus directly challenged America's founding paradox. Presidents Truman and Eisenhower pushed for desegregation, recognizing the hypocrisy of American democracy in the face of Jim and Juan Crow laws. Landmark Supreme Court decisions like Shelly v. Kraemer (1948) and Brown v. Board of Education (1954) began to dismantle legal segregation, signaling a move towards universal equality.
The conservative counter-movement. This expansion of equality infuriated a minority of "Movement Conservatives" (Hoover Republicans, libertarians, fundamentalists) who saw government activism as "socialism" destroying individualism. Led by figures like Senator Joseph McCarthy and William F. Buckley Jr., they launched a narrative campaign, arguing that "liberals" were a "cabal" undermining America by promoting communism and redistributing wealth. They sought to replace reasoned debate with an "orthodoxy" of strict Christianity and individualism.
9. The New West's Ascendancy: Fueling the Conservative Narrative
The rhetoric of Buckley’s Movement Conservatives on race mirrored the warning posed by the Democrats during the Reconstruction years: a behemoth federal government was using tax dollars to help redistribute wealth to undeserving black people.
Westward shift and military-industrial complex. World War II and the Cold War dramatically shifted America's population and economic power westward, particularly to California. Massive government investment in war industries and defense contracts fueled this growth, creating a "military-industrial complex" that became a powerful economic and political force. Westerners, dependent on these contracts, paradoxically railed against the "eastern establishment" and "liberal elite" for being soft on communism and over-regulating business.
Racial backlash. This western anti-communism dovetailed perfectly with Movement Conservative arguments. Desegregation efforts, like Eisenhower's intervention in Little Rock (1957) and Kennedy's at the University of Mississippi (1962), were framed as communist plots to redistribute wealth to "undeserving" black people. Organizations like the John Birch Society, backed by wealthy industrialists, explicitly linked the civil rights movement to communism, providing an intellectual justification for segregation.
The cowboy's return. The cowboy archetype, embodying self-reliance and anti-government sentiment, became a powerful symbol for this conservative backlash. Popular TV westerns like Gunsmoke and Bonanza depicted white men fighting evil without government help, reinforcing a myth of individualism built on racial and gender exclusion. Barry Goldwater, a wealthy Arizona senator, personified this "old school" westerner, launching his 1964 presidential campaign on a platform of small government, states' rights, and a strong military, explicitly appealing to white voters in the South and West.
10. Reagan's Revolution: Oligarchy's Resurgence Through Individualism
“Government is not the solution to our problem,” he announced to the nation. “Government is the problem.”
Goldwater's legacy. Barry Goldwater's 1964 campaign, though a landslide loss, laid the groundwork for a new political narrative. Movement Conservatives, led by figures like Phyllis Schlafly and Ronald Reagan, argued that an "intellectual elite" was deliberately complicating problems and that simple, individualist solutions were best. Reagan, a master of folksy anecdotes, blamed "liberals" and big government for society's ills, ignoring the West's dependence on federal contracts.
The Southern Strategy. Richard Nixon, recognizing the power of this narrative, adopted the "southern strategy" in 1968, abandoning federal desegregation efforts to court white southern voters. His campaign, expertly managed by Roger Ailes, used television to craft a compelling "us versus them" narrative, portraying Nixon's supporters as "good Americans" against "radical liberals" and "angry minorities." This strategy successfully fractured the liberal consensus.
Reagan's triumph. By 1980, fueled by anxieties over riots, inflation, and foreign crises, Reagan rode the Movement Conservative narrative into the White House. Launching his campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, he promised to cut taxes, deregulate business, restore traditional values, and build up the military. His inaugural address, delivered from the Capitol's West Front, declared, "Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem," signaling a dramatic shift towards an individualist, anti-government ideology that would concentrate wealth at the top.
11. The Modern Oligarchy: Consolidating Power Through Division
“capitalism is a lot more important than democracy.”
The Great Divergence. Reagan's policies, driven by "supply-side economics," slashed taxes for the wealthy and deregulated industries, reversing the post-war "Great Compression." This led to a "Great Divergence," where wealth concentrated at the top, disproportionately harming minorities and women. While most Americans saw their economic standing decline, Movement Conservatives maintained power by blaming "takers" and "liberals" for society's problems.
Political manipulation. To solidify their control, Republicans, led by figures like Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist, systematically purged moderates ("RINOs") from the party. They used:
- Voter suppression: Implementing voter ID laws and restricting registration, disproportionately affecting Democratic-leaning minority voters.
- Gerrymandering: Redrawing congressional districts to guarantee Republican majorities, even when losing the popular vote.
- Media control: Establishing outlets like Fox News to push their ideology and discredit "liberal" media, shaping public discourse.
These tactics ensured that a minority faction could control the government, regardless of popular will.
Trump's culmination. Donald Trump, a master of reality television, amplified this narrative, actively cultivating white supremacist support and denigrating minorities and women. His administration enacted massive tax cuts for the wealthy, slashed regulations, and appointed officials who prioritized profit over public service. Trump's rhetoric, portraying America as a land of "carnage" and attacking the press as "the enemy of the people," eerily echoed antebellum slaveholders, completing the cycle of oligarchy by concentrating power and wealth among a few, while silencing opposition.
12. The Enduring Paradox and the Hope for True Equality
Our country’s peculiar history has kept the question open.
A recurring battle. The conflict between a hierarchical society and one based on equality is deeply embedded in American history, a battle fought since its founding. Twice, oligarchs have risen to power by exploiting the American paradox, convincing voters that extending self-determination to people of color, women, and the poor would destroy liberty for white men. The Civil War and World War II briefly challenged this paradox, but it always reasserted itself.
The current challenge. By 2018, the nation found itself in a situation reminiscent of 1860, with a president defining America as a land of "carnage" and implementing policies that benefited a wealthy few at the expense of the majority. The Movement Conservatives, having taken over the Republican Party, had successfully re-established a hierarchical society, using the same divisive rhetoric and tactics as their antebellum predecessors.
A new path forward. Crucially, this time, all Americans have a voice. Unlike past eras where women and minorities were politically silenced, they are now a powerful and increasingly unified voting bloc. The 2018 midterm elections saw female candidates articulating a new vision emphasizing community and fairness over individualism and its implied racial, class, and gender roles. This growing collective voice, particularly from women and voters of color, offers the potential to finally dismantle the American paradox and achieve a true "new birth of freedom" for all.
Last updated:
