Key Takeaways
1. Great Generals Are First and Foremost Master Managers
The warriors of legend, the commanders who achieved dramatic feats on the battlefield, were, first and foremost, highly effective managers.
Core Function: Management. Generals, often perceived as battlefield tacticians, spend the vast majority of their careers managing vast, complex organizations. Their primary role involves meticulous preparation, ensuring troops are fed, clothed, equipped, and trained for months or years before combat. Victory is often 90% preparation, with only 10% dedicated to unforeseen emergencies during battle.
Beyond Combat: Detail Orientation. Even outside of direct warfare, generals manage complex logistics, personnel, and resources. Poor management often leads to armies disintegrating before battle or collapsing under stress. The skills separating "Great Captains" from others were their ability to handle a "mountain of detail and nonlethal decision making," a talent that is crucial for any large-scale operation.
Modern Relevance: Timeless Techniques. Historically, large armies were the only organizations comparable to modern businesses in scale and complexity. The management techniques developed by these ancient leaders, though not explicitly termed "management" then, are timeless. They offer invaluable lessons for today's executives facing information overload and the need for effective leadership under pressure, proving that fundamental principles endure across centuries and contexts.
2. Vision and Strategic Foresight Drive Grand Ambition
Alexander thought big, logically, and followed up on his visions.
Grand Ambition: Conquer the World. Great Captains possessed an unparalleled strategic vision, seeing possibilities far beyond their contemporaries. Alexander the Great, for instance, envisioned not just conquering the vast Persian Empire, but uniting diverse cultures under a Hellenized civilization, a concept revolutionary for his era. This "big, big vision" guided his every move, from military campaigns to political and social policies.
Long-Term Planning: Lasting Impact. Their visions were not fleeting dreams but meticulously planned long-term objectives. Charlemagne sought to redefine Europe, creating a political unity unseen since Rome, while Napoleon aimed to reshape French officialdom and dominate the continent. These leaders understood that true greatness lay in establishing systems and legacies that would endure for centuries, not just temporary victories.
Purposeful Action: Beyond the Battlefield. This grand vision extended beyond military conquest to encompass economic, cultural, and administrative reforms. Alexander founded cities to spread Greek culture, Charlemagne standardized currency and encouraged trade, and Napoleon instituted the Napoleonic Code. Their strategic foresight allowed them to leverage military success into lasting societal transformation, demonstrating that a clear, overarching purpose is essential for monumental achievement.
3. Masterful Communication Shapes Perception and Motivates Action
While Caesar is thought of as a successful general and ambitious politician, his greatest asset was communication.
Clarity and Precision: Avoiding Disaster. Effective communication is the bedrock of leadership, and Great Captains excelled at it. They understood that clear, precise messages were vital to prevent misunderstandings that could lead to catastrophic failures on the battlefield or in governance. Caesar, for example, was renowned for his simple, direct oratory and writing, ensuring his commands and narratives were always understood.
Tailored Messaging: Diverse Audiences. These leaders adeptly communicated with various groups: subordinates, superiors, allies, and the public. Caesar's ability to craft compelling speeches and self-authored campaign histories (like The Gallic Wars) allowed him to mold public opinion and motivate his armies. Norman Schwarzkopf's direct, simple, and truthful press briefings during the Gulf War exemplify this, ensuring his story was told his way.
Trust and Discipline: The Foundation. Effective communication also hinges on trust and discipline. Great Captains fostered environments where messages were expected to be accurate and orders promptly executed. They kept superiors and peers informed, avoiding the confusion that arises from poor information flow. This meticulous approach to communication, whether written or spoken, was a consistent hallmark of their success.
4. Adaptability and Innovation Are Keys to Overcoming Disadvantage
Gustavus continually looked for ways to improve his country and his army, and he was not afraid to make radical changes.
Embracing Change: A Constant Imperative. Great Captains understood that plans and organizations were not static. They constantly adapted their strategies and tactics in response to changing conditions and unforeseen events. Frederick the Great, for instance, consistently turned seemingly hopeless situations to his advantage by being flexible in his negotiations and battlefield actions, always seeking an edge against more numerous foes.
Technological Leverage: Redefining Warfare. Many Great Captains were keen innovators and early adopters of technology. Gustavus Adolphus radically reengineered his Swedish army, standardizing artillery, lightening muskets, and developing new cavalry tactics, earning him the title "father of modern warfare." Genghis Khan made it a policy to seek out and integrate new technologies from conquered territories, from siege engines to early gunpowder weapons, making his armies formidable.
Learning from Others: Best Practices. Adaptability also meant learning from others. Alexander and Genghis Khan absorbed techniques and tools from the cultures they conquered, integrating them to enhance their military and diplomatic prowess. Gustavus studied Dutch tactics, and Frederick built upon a century of Prussian military tradition. This willingness to adopt "best practices" and challenge the status quo, even at great personal risk, was a defining characteristic of their leadership.
5. Logistics and Organization Are the Unsung Heroes of Success
Alexander’s supply arrangements are still studied by military historians as an example of what ancient armies were capable of in this area.
Meticulous Planning: The Backbone of Campaigns. The Great Captains were extraordinary organizers, ensuring their fighting forces had everything needed, precisely when required. Alexander the Great's logistical prowess, including limiting camp followers and establishing advance teams to procure supplies, allowed his army to move faster and sustain itself more efficiently than any opponent. This meticulous planning minimized unpleasant surprises and maintained control.
Organizational Structure: Enabling Execution. They constantly refined their organizational structures to maximize effectiveness. Genghis Khan standardized his army into units of ten, a hundred, a thousand, and ten thousand, simplifying training and command. Napoleon's reforms of the French government, culminating in the Napoleonic Code, provided a unified administrative framework that efficiently mobilized national resources for his vast campaigns.
Staff Management: Efficiency vs. Bureaucracy. While Great Captains valued skilled assistants, they also grappled with the perennial problem of staff proliferation. Charlemagne's "missi dominici" system of auditors kept local officials and royal properties accountable, preventing bureaucratic bloat. The challenge, then as now, was to maintain a lean, effective support structure that genuinely aided the "warriors" on the front lines, rather than becoming an impediment.
6. People Skills and Loyalty Build Unstoppable Teams
There’s a great deal of talk about loyalty from the bottom to the top. Loyalty from the top down is even more necessary and is much less prevalent.
Relating to Troops: The Common Touch. Great Captains understood that genuine connection with their soldiers fostered immense loyalty. Patton, despite his flamboyant image, spent considerable time "leading by wandering around," inspecting units, and talking to men and officers. This direct engagement, often sharing the same hardships, communicated care and built a bond that motivated troops to perform beyond expectation.
Cultivating Loyalty: Beyond Fear. While discipline was paramount, Great Captains knew that loyalty born of respect was far more potent than fear. U.S. Grant's modesty and unwavering focus on his men's welfare, coupled with his optimism, inspired deep devotion. He famously stated, "Loyalty from the top down is even more necessary," emphasizing that leaders must first demonstrate commitment to their subordinates.
Hiring the Best: Maximizing Talent. Recognizing that a commander is only as capable as his subordinates, Great Captains actively sought out and cultivated top talent. MacArthur, for example, attracted brilliant officers like Dwight Eisenhower to his staff, pushing them to their limits while providing exciting leadership. They understood that investing in superior individuals, even if they were ambitious or challenging, yielded disproportionately higher productivity and success.
7. Courage and Decisiveness Turn the Tide of Battle and Business
When most generals would have panicked, Grant remained calm. This attribute let him remain in control of the situation instead of the situation controlling him.
Unwavering Resolve: The Mark of a Leader. Great Captains possessed immense courage, not just in facing death, but in making high-stakes decisions. U.S. Grant's daring during the Vicksburg Campaign, cutting off his own supply lines, was a calculated risk that paid off, demonstrating his willingness to "roll the dice" when opportunity arose. His calm demeanor amidst chaos was legendary, allowing him to maintain control when others panicked.
Calculated Risks: Opportunity vs. Rashness. The difference between courage and rashness lies in meticulous planning and understanding the potential payoffs. Frederick the Great, despite often being outnumbered, consistently took calculated risks on the battlefield, leveraging his superior training and innovative tactics to achieve victory. He understood when to commit fully and when to hold back, always with a clear objective in mind.
Inspiring Action: Leading from the Front. Decisiveness inspires confidence in subordinates. When leaders demonstrate a clear path forward and the courage to pursue it, their teams are more likely to follow with conviction. Norman Schwarzkopf's willingness to speak out against premature attack plans, prioritizing troop safety over political pressure, showcased a moral courage that resonated deeply with his forces and ultimately led to a low-casualty victory.
8. Resourcefulness and Financial Acumen Fuel Expansion
Edward emulated his ancestor, William of Normandy, and sought to make the war in France pay for itself.
Self-Funding Operations: War as an LBO. Great Captains understood the critical link between military ambition and financial resources. Edward III, facing immense debt and a parliament reluctant to fund his wars, effectively turned the Hundred Years' War into a leveraged buyout. By systematically pillaging French lands and capturing nobles for ransom, he made the war profitable for England, attracting thousands of eager soldiers.
Fiscal Discipline: Building a Strong Base. Frederick William I, Frederick the Great's father, meticulously restored Prussia's finances through austere living, dedicating up to 80% of annual revenue to building a formidable army. This fiscal discipline provided Frederick the Great with the high-quality military he needed to survive and expand his small kingdom against larger, wealthier adversaries.
Creative Financing: Beyond Traditional Means. Napoleon, despite inheriting a chaotic post-revolutionary economy, maximized France's resources by implementing efficient tax systems and leveraging the wealth of conquered territories. He understood that sustained military power required innovative financial strategies, even if it meant resorting to "protection rackets" or seizing assets, ensuring his armies were always well-funded and equipped.
9. Continuous Self-Development and Mentorship Are Lifelong Pursuits
Becoming a master of warfare, or a master of business, is a lifelong pursuit.
Lifelong Learning: Mastering the Craft. Great Captains were relentless in their pursuit of knowledge and self-improvement. Patton, despite being dyslexic, developed an amazing memory and tenacity, constantly studying military history, tactics, and even naval battles. He attended every military school possible and sought out experts, like the best swordsman in Europe for the Olympics, to hone his skills.
Mentorship: Learning from the Best. They actively sought out and cultivated relationships with mentors. Frederick the Great, for example, was tutored by Prince Leopold I, the "Old Dessauer," one of his father's best generals, and maintained a lifelong intellectual exchange with Voltaire. These relationships provided invaluable guidance and intellectual stimulation, shaping their leadership philosophies.
Leading by Example: Inspiring Growth. In turn, Great Captains became mentors themselves, attracting and developing promising young officers. Patton's extensive training of his tank corps, where he personally taught and led, not only bonded him with his men but also deepened his own understanding of the subject. This cycle of learning, mentoring, and self-development was crucial for maintaining their intellectual edge and ensuring a continuous supply of capable leaders.
10. Turning Disaster into Triumph Requires Resilience
Where other generals saw defeat, Grant saw victory. Where other generals saw problems, Grant saw solutions.
Unwavering Optimism: The Will to Win. Great Captains possessed an indomitable spirit that allowed them to rebound from crushing defeats. U.S. Grant, after a devastating first day at the Battle of Shiloh, famously declared, "Lick 'em tomorrow, though." His optimism and refusal to quit, even when others saw only defeat, were instrumental in turning around seemingly lost situations and ultimately winning the Civil War.
Learning from Setbacks: Adapting and Overcoming. Rather than being paralyzed by failure, these leaders meticulously analyzed their mistakes and adapted their strategies. Frederick the Great, despite losing as many battles as he won, consistently rebuilt his forces and faced his enemies again, eventually wearing them down. His post-battle analyses were brutally honest, leading to continuous improvements in tactics and training.
Resilience in Crisis: The True Test. Douglas MacArthur, despite the catastrophic loss of the Philippines in 1942, was ordered by President Roosevelt to leave and assume command of Allied forces in Australia. This apparent defeat became the springboard for his legendary "island-hopping" campaign, demonstrating his ability to transform personal and strategic disasters into opportunities for future triumph. His resilience in the face of adversity was a hallmark of his career.
11. Strategic Alliances Amplify Power and Reach
The Great Captains knew that even enemies could be, at times, partners.
Coalition Building: A Force Multiplier. Great Captains understood that no single entity, however powerful, could achieve all its goals alone. They masterfully forged alliances, even with unlikely partners, to amplify their strength and achieve strategic objectives. Norman Schwarzkopf's success in the Gulf War hinged on his ability to coordinate a diverse coalition of thirty-three nations, including many from the Middle East, overcoming cultural and political sensitivities.
Diplomatic Acumen: Managing Diverse Interests. Building and maintaining alliances required exceptional diplomatic skills. Caesar, for instance, formed a powerful triumvirate with rivals Crassus and Pompey, leveraging their combined influence to control Rome. He understood that alliances were often temporary and required constant negotiation and careful management of competing interests to prevent internal strife.
Leveraging Weaknesses: Strategic Partnerships. Sometimes, alliances were formed out of necessity or to exploit an opponent's weaknesses. Frederick the Great, surrounded by more powerful enemies, skillfully played European powers against each other, forming temporary alliances with either France or Britain to ensure Prussia's survival. These leaders recognized that even traditional enemies could be valuable partners when their interests aligned, if only for a time.
12. The Power of Propaganda and Public Image
In his own lifetime, Alexander was much admired and well thought of. This was largely due to these primitive, but effective, public-relations efforts.
Shaping Narratives: Controlling the Story. Great Captains were pioneers in public relations, understanding the immense power of shaping public opinion. Alexander the Great, Edward III, and Napoleon all meticulously crafted their public image through proclamations, letters, and controlled media. Napoleon, in particular, used bulletins from his campaigns and controlled the press to ensure favorable coverage, acting like he was "always running for reelection."
Personal Brand: Beyond the Battlefield. Their flamboyance and distinctive personal styles were often deliberate acts of showmanship designed to capture attention and inspire loyalty. Patton cultivated an image of an impulsive cowboy, complete with ivory-handled revolvers, to motivate his troops. MacArthur's eccentric dress and corncob pipe made him stand out, a "showman" who understood the value of a strong personal brand in a media-driven world.
Media Manipulation: A Double-Edged Sword. While effective, manipulating the media was a dangerous game. MacArthur, despite his early success as an army liaison to the press, later faced intense criticism and ridicule from journalists who felt manipulated. He learned that while a strong public image could be a powerful tool, it also created enemies who would use their media access to undermine his reputation, highlighting the risks of aggressive public relations.
Last updated:
