Key Takeaways
1. The Mind's Unity Persists Despite Brain Division.
Even when the brain is split in half, many important aspects of the mind remain unified. Thus, the mind is something that the brain isn’t.
Challenging materialism. The radical procedure of corpus callosotomy, which surgically splits the massive nerve bundle connecting the brain's hemispheres, offers profound insights into the mind. Despite this physical division, patients consistently report a unified sense of self and an intact inner experience, directly contradicting the notion that the mind is merely a product of brain activity.
Beyond physical localization. Pioneering neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield, through thousands of awake brain surgeries, found he could stimulate movements, sensations, emotions, and memories, but never abstract thought or free will. This suggests that these higher cognitive functions are not localized in specific brain regions. Further split-brain research by Roger Sperry and Justine Sergent revealed:
- Split perception: Patients might process visual information in one hemisphere but be unable to verbalize it if the language center is in the disconnected hemisphere.
- Unified consciousness: Despite perceptual disunity, patients demonstrate an ability to integrate conflicting information and make coherent decisions, indicating a single, overarching consciousness.
This distinction between brain-dependent physical perceptions and brain-independent abstract reasoning highlights that while the brain facilitates mental functions, the core, unified mind operates beyond mere physical processes, maintaining its integrity even when its physical substrate is divided.
2. Consciousness Can Function with Severely Damaged or Absent Brains.
Although the cerebral cortex is considered by researchers to be the “thinking” part of the brain, some basic thinking occurs with no cortex at all.
Remarkable resilience. The mind's capacity to function despite extensive brain damage or even congenital absence profoundly challenges the materialist view that the mind is solely the brain's product. Cases like Charles, who lost half his cerebellum yet became a college basketball player, or Emilia Clarke, who recovered from life-threatening brain aneurysms, demonstrate this unexpected resilience.
Defying expectations. Medical literature documents numerous individuals living normal, or even exceptional, lives with significant brain deficiencies.
- Mora Leeb: Had her entire left hemisphere removed as an infant due to epilepsy, yet developed into a typical teenager with sophisticated language understanding.
- Katie: Born with most of her brain replaced by cerebrospinal fluid, yet achieved normal development and academic success.
- Hydranencephaly: Children born without cerebral hemispheres can still exhibit basic awareness, emotions, and responsiveness, suggesting that consciousness may originate from the brain stem, a more primitive part of the brain, rather than exclusively the cerebral cortex.
These cases defy conventional neuroscientific models, which struggle to explain how such extensive loss doesn't result in profound, consistent disability. Neuroplasticity, while a factor, cannot fully account for the mind's ability to adapt and thrive with drastically altered brain structures, pointing to a deeper, non-physical aspect of consciousness.
3. Near-Death Experiences Provide Evidence of Mind Beyond Brain Death.
It is clear evidence that the mind can function quite independently of the brain.
Mind beyond body. Near-death experiences (NDEs) offer compelling evidence that the mind can operate even when the brain is clinically dead. Advances in medical resuscitation have led to an increasing number of documented NDEs, often characterized by profound peace, out-of-body sensations, encounters with light, and interactions with deceased relatives.
Veridical accounts. The most striking NDEs are "veridical," where experiencers report accurate details of events that occurred while they were clinically dead and could not have perceived physically.
- Pam Reynolds: During hypothermic cardiac arrest (brain dead, no blood flow, silent EEG, loud clicks in ears), she accurately recalled surgical details, including the shape of a surgical drill and conversations about her veins.
- Bruce Greyson's patient: Reported seeing a spaghetti stain on the doctor's tie during an out-of-body experience, which was later confirmed.
- Child patient: Described his own complex skull surgery in meticulous visual detail, despite being under general anesthesia with his eyes and face covered.
These verified accounts challenge the materialist assumption that consciousness ceases with brain activity. The AWARE trials, a prospective study, further documented instances of awareness during cardiac arrest, including a patient hearing automated defibrillator instructions. Such evidence strongly suggests the mind can function independently of the brain, hinting at its non-physical nature.
4. Materialist Explanations for the Mind and NDEs Are Inadequate.
The bottom line is that none of them hold water. There isn’t even a remotely plausible physical explanation for this phenomenon.
Skeptical theories fail. Despite the compelling evidence for NDEs and the mind's resilience, materialist science often attempts to explain them away through purely physical mechanisms. However, these skeptical theories consistently fall short, failing to account for the full range and consistency of NDE phenomena.
Common debunking attempts and their flaws:
- Birth memories: This theory, popularized by Carl Sagan, is disproven by the stark differences in experience (peace vs. trauma) and the fact that NDEs occur regardless of birth method (vaginal vs. C-section).
- Wishful thinking/hallucinations: NDEs are often unexpected, consistent across cultures, and lead to profound, life-changing transformations, unlike typical hallucinations which are fragmented, disturbing, and idiosyncratic.
- Hypoxia (low oxygen): Hypoxia typically causes confusion, fear, and impaired memory, the opposite of the clarity and peace reported in NDEs. Studies show oxygen levels in NDE patients are often higher, not lower, than in non-NDE patients.
- Temporal lobe seizures/brain chemicals: Seizures have distinct, disorganized patterns unlike NDEs, and NDEs occur when brain activity is absent. Drug effects are varied, inconsistent, and cannot explain the coherent, often veridical, nature of NDEs.
The sheer variety and mutual contradiction of these materialist explanations highlight their weakness. They often focus on isolated aspects of NDEs while ignoring others, or propose mechanisms that are physiologically implausible during clinical brain death. This persistent failure to provide a coherent materialist explanation strengthens the case for a non-physical aspect of the mind.
5. The Human Soul's Immortality Is Supported by Reason and Evidence.
The soul is not “composed” in the first place. “Whatever is composed (of parts) can be decomposed: a molecule into atoms, a cell into molecules, an organ into cells, a body into organs, a person into body and soul. But the soul is not composed, therefore not decomposable.”
Beyond physical death. The concept of an immortal soul is a perennial and nearly universal human belief, not merely wishful thinking. This conviction is supported by both philosophical reasoning and scientific observations, suggesting that the mind's survival after brain death is not temporary but inherent to its nature.
Indivisible and non-physical. The human soul, particularly its rational aspect, is a unity without physical parts.
- It cannot be split by surgery, as demonstrated by split-brain patients who maintain a unified consciousness.
- It can function with severely damaged or absent brain parts, as seen in cases of hydranencephaly or extensive brain injury.
- It can manifest lucidity even as the brain is dying, a phenomenon known as terminal lucidity.
- Pure concepts like justice, mercy, or the number 7 are immaterial and cannot "die"; similarly, the soul, which comprehends these, is also immaterial and thus not subject to physical decay.
If the soul has no parts, it cannot decompose like a physical body. Its immaterial nature means it is not subject to physical laws of decay or annihilation. This philosophical understanding, combined with evidence from NDEs and the mind's resilience, provides a strong basis for believing in the soul's inherent immortality.
6. Free Will Is a Real, Immaterial Power of the Soul.
The will seems to have a separate existence, independent of the brain. That convinced Penfield that free will is real.
Challenging determinism. The denial of free will, a popular stance among many neuroscientists, posits that all human actions are predetermined by brain chemistry and physical laws. However, this view is logically self-refuting and contradicts universal human experience, where we inherently act as if we have choices and hold ourselves and others morally accountable.
Evidence for free will:
- Logical inconsistency: If thoughts are merely determined by physics, they have no truth value, including the claim that free will doesn't exist. This renders any argument against free will meaningless.
- Physics: Nobel Prize-winning quantum mechanics research (Bell's theorem, Aspect, Clauser, Zeilinger) demonstrates fundamental indeterminacy in nature, leaving room for free will to operate without violating physical laws.
- Neuroscience (Penfield): During awake brain surgery, Penfield could stimulate movements, but patients invariably reported, "You did that," never "I willed that." He found no "will center" in the brain, inferring that the will is an immaterial power.
- Neuroscience (Libet): While a "readiness potential" (brain activity) precedes conscious decisions, Libet found no such potential for the "veto" (free won't), suggesting the ability to accept or reject impulses is free. More recent research indicates that meaningful decisions are not preceded by these potentials.
Free will is not merely an illusion but an intrinsic, immaterial power of the human soul. It allows us to choose, reason, and be morally responsible, forming the bedrock of human society, law, and dignity. To deny it is to embrace a view that is both illogical and profoundly dehumanizing.
7. Traditional Philosophy Offers the Best Model for the Mind-Brain Relationship.
The traditional account of the mind is much truer: The mind (several powers of the soul) is what the living person is and does, the sum of activities that make us alive.
Materialism's failures. Over the past century, materialist theories of the mind—including behaviorism (ignoring inner states), identity theory (mind is brain), and functionalism (mind as a computer)—have failed to adequately explain consciousness, intentionality, and abstract thought. Eliminative materialism, which simply denies the mind's existence as "folk psychology," is self-refuting, as one must be conscious to hold such a belief.
Aristotle and Aquinas's insights. Ancient philosophers like Aristotle, adapted by theologians like Thomas Aquinas, offered a dualist model that aligns remarkably well with modern neuroscience. They identified three types of souls, each with distinct powers:
- Vegetative soul: Responsible for growth, feeding, and reproduction (shared by plants, animals, and humans).
- Sensitive soul: Adds sensation, movement, memory, and emotion (shared by animals and humans).
- Rational (Spiritual) soul: Unique to humans, encompassing intellect (abstract thought) and free will.
While vegetative and sensitive powers are tightly linked to the body and brain, rational powers are immaterial and have no physical organ. This explains why abstract concepts (like perfect circles, which cannot exist physically) cannot arise from imperfect physical perceptions, and why intellect and will are not localized in the brain. This traditional view provides a coherent framework for understanding the mind's material and immaterial aspects, avoiding the conceptual dilemmas of materialism.
8. The Human Mind (Soul) Did Not Evolve and Points to a Divine Creator.
The evidence available shows that the specifically human mind, with its capacity for abstract thought and free will (that is, the human soul), could not and did not evolve.
Human exceptionalism. The human capacity for abstract thought, complex language, and moral reasoning is unique among all known life-forms, posing a profound challenge to Darwinian evolution. While animals communicate and exhibit intelligence, they lack the ability to grasp abstract concepts, use complex grammar, or contemplate philosophical questions like "Why am I here?"
Evolutionary gaps. There is no scientific evidence for a gradual evolutionary progression from animal minds to the human mind.
- DNA/Neurons: Minor genetic differences with chimps (1%) or higher neuron counts in elephants do not explain human intellectual superiority.
- Animal intelligence: Ravens and octopuses show remarkable intelligence but lack abstract thought, demonstrating a qualitative, not just quantitative, difference.
- Language: Apes can learn signals, but not the abstract syntax and grammar of human language, which allows for limitless expression of meaning.
- Fossil record: There are no "fossil minds" showing a gradual development of abstract thought. Early humans (e.g., Neanderthals, Göbekli Tepe builders) already exhibited complex symbolic behaviors like art, ritual burial, and monumental architecture, suggesting a sudden appearance of these capacities.
The immaterial nature of abstract thought and free will means they cannot be products of material evolution. Darwinian theory, which operates on material changes and survival, cannot account for the origin of these spiritual powers. The existence of a uniquely human mind, capable of contemplating its own origins and purpose, strongly implies a special creation by a divine Mind.
9. Artificial Intelligence Cannot Replicate Human Consciousness or Soul.
The most significant limitation of artificial intelligence is embedded in its name. The only thing it can do is compute.
Computation vs. Consciousness. Despite claims of sentient chatbots and predictions of conscious computers, Artificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally operates on computation—manipulating 1s and 0s according to algorithms. This inherent limitation means AI cannot replicate human consciousness, which involves meaning, creativity, and common sense, none of which can be reduced to mechanical processes.
AI's inherent deficits:
- Lack of creativity: AI can generate complex outputs (like Go moves or text), but it cannot originate truly novel ideas or understand aesthetic value. Creativity is what we don't know how to program; once programmed, it becomes a mechanical process.
- Lack of common sense: AI lacks an understanding of the world, making it prone to errors in reasoning or "hallucinations" (generating nonsensical but authoritative-sounding information). It cannot grasp meaning, only patterns and statistical relationships in data.
- Dependence on human input: Chatbots (Large Language Models) rely on vast human-generated data and continuous human programming and correction to function. Without this input, their output can decay into nonsense, demonstrating their lack of independent thought.
The brain is not a computer, and the mind is not software. Human consciousness is characterized by intentionality ("aboutness")—thoughts are about something. Computation, by contrast, is inherently blind to meaning. AI serves as a powerful tool created by conscious humans, but it cannot possess a soul or achieve human-like consciousness because it lacks the immaterial qualities that define it.
10. The Spiritual Nature of the Soul Has Profound Implications for Life.
The fact that we have souls, that our souls are spiritual and made in God’s image and are destined for immortal life, is the most important thing about us. Nothing matters more.
Eternal significance. Recognizing the spiritual and immortal nature of the human soul transforms our understanding of life's purpose and our responsibilities. This truth impacts every aspect of human existence, from personal relationships to societal structures, imbuing our actions with eternal consequences.
Impact on human values:
- Marriage & Family: These are unions of immortal spirits, participating in the creation of new spiritual souls, demanding profound responsibility and eternal commitment.
- Free Will: Confirms our inherent freedom and moral accountability, foundational for justice, ethics, and personal growth.
- Human Dignity: Every person, regardless of physical or mental state (e.g., disabled, elderly, unborn), possesses an immortal soul, deserving of equal respect, love, and care. This truth fundamentally challenges dehumanizing ideologies like racism, eugenics, or totalitarianism.
- War: Highlights the spiritual nature of all humans, including "enemies," underscoring that the real war we fight is spiritual, against evil within ourselves and the world.
Science and truth. The scientific community's widespread silence on the soul's spiritual and immortal nature is a "lie by omission," hindering a complete understanding of reality. Acknowledging the soul's existence, its non-evolutionary origin, and its divine source is crucial for a science that truly seeks truth. Ultimately, this truth calls us to recognize our need for divine love and forgiveness, as our immortal lives leave eternal tracks, making every choice profoundly significant.
Last updated:
